Academic Partnerships Policy

Eileen Long
Eileen Long
  • Updated

1. Purpose

This policy outlines NCI’s approach to forming formal agreements with academic institutions for the design, delivery, and/or admission of students to validated programmes. It ensures all institutional partnerships linked to specified programmes of study are academically robust and meet institutional, national, and international quality assurance standards, including the Lisbon Recognition Convention. The policy defines NCI’s governance, management and risk mitigation structures to achieve academic and strategic goals while safeguarding academic integrity, the quality of learner and faculty experiences, and institutional reputation.

2. Scope and Definitions

This policy applies to all formal academic partnership arrangements between NCI and any other Irish, European or international partner institution through: 

  • The validation of a programme of study co- designed and/or co- delivered with one or more external partner institution whose roles and responsibilities are outlined in the following documents:
     
    • Memorandum of Understanding (MoU): A non-legally binding statement of intent outlining broad cooperation aims between institutions. The signing of an MoU does not in itself authorise programme delivery, learner recruitment, or academic commitment.
    • Memorandum of Agreement (MoA): A legally binding agreement defining rights, responsibilities, and obligations for collaborative academic programme delivery.   Sometimes referred to as a cooperation, collaboration or consortium agreement. 
    • Service Level Agreement (SLA): A legally binding document specifying when one institution provides defined services to the other.
  • An Articulation Agreement (AA): A legally binding structured pathway agreement where learners from NCI or from a partner institution are guaranteed to be admitted into a later stage of a specific validated programme, subject to meeting defined academic and procedural conditions specified in the Agreement. The pathway is based on academically mapped module and programme learning outcomes between the partner institutions.

This policy does not apply to:

  • Transnational delivery (currently outside of NCIs Scope of Provision with QQI). 
  • Dual or joint awards (currently outside of NCIs Scope of Provision with QQI).
  • Erasmus+ mobility or student exchange agreements, which are governed under the Erasmus+ Student Mobility Policy and related procedures.
  • Individual admissions decisions under approved articulation agreements are operationalised through NCI Admissions and RPL Policies.
  • Programmes developed and delivered against government contracts
  • Research, innovation, or strategic institutional partnerships that do not directly relate to the design, delivery, or quality assurance of academic programmes.
     

3. Principles

  • Scalable, sustainable and strategic academic partnerships will be sought to advance NCI’s mission, vision and strategic objectives.
  • NCI will partner with institutions of good standing that enhance the experiences, knowledge and impact of NCI’s learners, faculty, and graduates.
  • The College retains ultimate responsibility for the academic standards of its QQI validated programmes, regardless of delivery location or partner involvement.
  • The roles and responsibilities of NCI and its partners will be clearly defined, formally agreed, consistently implemented and regularly reviewed.
  • All partnerships will operate with transparency in relation to academic integrity, management, governance, decision-making, and learner-facing information.
  • Learners studying through formal partnership arrangements or articulated pathways will be treated fairly and equitably.
  • Differences in mode, location, or partner context will not compromise academic quality, integrity, learner supports or the ability to achieve learning outcomes.
  • All collaborative academic partnerships and formal articulation arrangements are subject to relevant national, European and international legislation.

4. Policy Statements

  • The College will undertake formal due diligence to evaluate any potential academic partner’s suitability prior to entering into a formal agreement.
  • Academic Council, supported by the Academic Programmes and Quality Committee (APQC) will approve and monitor all proposed and existing academic partnership programmes and articulation agreements.
  • No collaborative academic programme will be delivered without a MoA (or equivalent legally binding document) signed by the NCI President.
  • All academic partnership arrangements will be specified in programme validation documents and reviewed through structured annual programme monitoring, review, and reporting processes.
  • Any material changes to delivery, staffing, or learner supports will be identified, reviewed and mitigations applied where appropriate to minimise risks.
  • Partnership risks and the effectiveness of risk mitigations will be monitored by the NCI Senior Leadership Team and Governing Body.
  • Learner progression, achievement data and feedback will be regularly reviewed and used to inform decision making at a programme, School and College level.
  • An accurate and complete Register of Academic Partnerships will be held and maintained by the QIE Team and be accessible as a reference point internally.
  • The Academic Partnerships Manager shall be the key point of contact for new and ongoing partnerships with contact details published on the NCI Website.
  • The outcomes of partnership monitoring will be reported to Academic Council, Governing Body and QQI through NCIs Annual Quality Report.  
  • Learners will receive clear, accurate information on collaborative partnership programme structures, partner roles and responsibilities, examination, award and graduation arrangements, and supports. 
  • Agreements must clearly specify responsibility for handling learner complaints, appeals, and academic misconduct.
  • All formal learner facing communications relating to partnership structures, delivery, awards, progression, or institutional responsibilities must be jointly approved and consistent across all institutions involved in the formal partnership.
  • Agreements must include data protection and data sharing provisions compliant with GDPR and institutional data governance policies.
  • Where programmes are subject to professional, statutory or regulatory body requirements, partnership arrangements must support continued compliance.
  • Agreements must include clear triggers, escalation and dispute resolution structures in the case of the termination or breakdown of a partnership arrangement, aligned with QQI requirements for learner protection and programme teach-out. 
  • Every 5 years as part of programme review in preparation for revalidation or retirement, the collaborative programme and any associated MoAs, SLAs, AA or will be reviewed and refreshed.

5. Procedures

This Policy is delivered across the following two phases captured in the separate Academic Partnerships Procedure:

6. Roles and Responsibilities

RoleResponsibilities
Academic Council
  • Approves all formal academic partnership and articulation agreements signed by the NCI President and Chair of Academic Council.
  • Reports to Governing Body on the quality of all formal academic partnership arrangements through the Annual Quality Report.
Academic Programmes and Quality Committee
  • APQC recommends partnership proposals and programme validation documentation to Academic Council for final institutional approval.
  • Reviews the quality of academic partnerships through annual programme and institutional quality monitoring reports.
Director of Finance and Company Secretary
  • Reviews MoU, MoA, SLA and AA proposals for institutional viability and resource feasibility prior to Academic Council approval.
  • Monitors, reviews and reports risks and mitigations associated with academic partnerships to the Risk Committee.
  • Reviews financial models, contractual provisions, and liability clauses.
  • Oversees legal compliance within NCI partnership templates and agreements NCI is asked to enter into by partner institutions.
Registrar
  • Overall responsibility for ensuring NCI’s academic partnerships align with relevant institutional, national and international QA requirements.
  • Ensures all formal agreements are signed and Registry systems are in place prior to and throughout programme delivery.
QIE Director
  • Ensures the NCI Register of Academic Partnerships is accurate, complete and accessible.
  • Ensures institutional quality standards and external regulatory requirements are met on all partnership programmes.
  • Prepares monitoring reports on academic partnerships.
Academic Partnerships Manager
  • Key contact for internal and external queries on prospective or existing academic partnerships.
  • Provides advice, training and guidance to staff and faculty.
  • Maintains an accurate and complete register of academic partnerships and signed agreements, including articulation agreements.
  • Coordinates all stages of the academic partnership lifecycle, including ensuring agreement conditions are met by NCI and partners.
  • Publishes information on NCI Partnerships on the NCI website. 
  • Completes the initial due diligence assessment following any initial requests/expressions of interest requests for a new partnership.
  • Identifies, monitors and escalates risks to the QIE Director.
Programme Lifecycle Manager
  • Works alongside the Academic Partnerships Manager to ensure stakeholders from partner institutions are engaged throughout the NCI programme lifecycle as outlined in MoU, MoA, SLA and AA documents.
  • Ensures all partnership programmes leading to a QQI award at NCI are included in the annual programme monitoring process.

Deans &

Vice-Deans

  • Academic leadership of proposed and existing partnership programmes  and articulation agreements within the School.
  • Evaluate any proposed or amendments to existing partnerships or articulation agreements within the School.
  • Formally approve academic partnership developments and academic mapping of credits, modules and programme learning outcomes for collaborative provision and articulation agreements. 
  • Formally approve the allocation or release of NCI Faculty for delivery and assessment on a partnership programme delivered at a partner institution.
  • Formally approve the qualifications of Faculty at the partner institution as suitable for delivery on an NCI partnership programme.
  • Escalation point for Programme Directors if: (i) academic partnerships are struggling, (ii) NCI or partners are failing to meet agreed conditions, roles or responsibilities or (iii) data suggests students are failing due to articulation agreements. 
Programme Directors
  • Leading on the development, delivery and review of a programme developed and/or delivered with a partner institution or that includes an articulation agreement with a partner institution.
  • Joint responsibility for academic oversight, curriculum delivery, assessment integrity and programme review within a partnership programme. 
  • Ensuring all formal partnership agreements are adhered to in delivery of the validated programme.
  • Capturing data, reviewing and reporting on the quality of the academic partnership, learner experience, learner progression and success data within annual and cyclical (5 yearly) programme monitoring processes.
  • Identifies, monitors and escalates risks to the Dean/Vice-Dean.
Faculty
  • Deliver teaching/assessment and engage in institutional QA processes as agreed and outlined in MoA, SLAs and AAs. 
Partner Institutions
  • Upholds obligations under MoA, SLAs, AA. 
  • Engage with NCI programme validation, quality assurance, monitoring and governance processes
Academic Operations Teams
  • Support students on partnership programmes or entering NCI through articulation agreements
  • Support faculty deliver partnership commitments as confirmed in validation documents, MoUs, MoAs, SLAs and AAs.
NCI Registry Teams
  • Maintain accurate and complete records for student admissions, enrolment, attendance, engagement, assessment, examinations, certification and graduations in accordance with GDPR requirements, programme validation documents, MoAs, SLAs and AAs.
Students
  • Engage fully with academic standards, integrity, attendance and engagement requirements.
  • Provide feedback via established channels at NCI and parter institutions.

Version Control

Reference CodePTR-POL-001Executive OwnerRegistrar
Policy/Procedure ManagerAcademic Partnerships ManagerApproval BodyAcademic Council
Date ApprovedMay 2026Effective DateSemester 1 2026/27
Date of Next ReviewMay 2029Version NumberV2.0

Change Log:

V2.0 This version supersedes V1.0. The policy has been revised and retitled from Policy on Collaborative Provision and Academic Partnerships to Academic Partnerships Policy. The scope has been refined to reflect NCI's current QQI-approved scope of provision: transnational education and dual or joint awards, previously addressed within this policy, are explicitly excluded as these arrangements fall outside NCI's current scope of provision with QQI. Programmes developed and delivered under government contracts have also been excluded from scope. Service Level Agreements (SLAs) have been added as a recognised formal agreement type. Operational and procedural content has been removed from this policy and transferred to a separate Academic Partnership Procedure. Governance references have been updated to reflect current institutional structures, including the role of the Senior Leadership Team. Executive ownership has transferred to the Registrar. The roles and responsibilities section has been expanded to reflect current institutional roles.

V1.0 This policy replaces and supersedes content previously contained in the Quality Assurance and Enhancement System (QAES), specifically Chapter 3 Section 3.6 “Policy and Procedures for the Design, Approval and Quality Management of Collaborative Provision & Transnational Education Programmes” and Section 3.7 “Policy for tendering to third parties for development and/or delivery of educational services”. It consolidates institutional requirements for collaborative provision and academic partnerships, including transnational education, articulation, advanced standing, and other formal academic partnership arrangements, ensuring consistency with current QQI guidelines and internal governance structures.

 

Was this article helpful?

Comments

0 comments

Please sign in to leave a comment.